Noise, Vibration & Evidence Explorer
Explore eight evidence categories and learn why a symptom description or a matching frequency alone does not prove the failed component.
Four Symptom-Pattern Journeys
Connect the reported condition, a safely obtained observation, a discriminating comparison, and the next evidence-based action.
Frequency & Symptom Investigation Lab
This classroom model compares a computed engine-rotation frequency and wheel-rotation frequency. The values are teaching examples, not a measured vibration trace or a diagnosis.
Frequency relationship bench
Engine rotation: rpm ÷ 60. Wheel rotation: road speed in m/s ÷ effective circumference. Neither value represents a verified vibration source, engine firing order, driveline ratio, or a usable OEM diagnostic limit. When the two computed frequencies happen to match, that is still not proof of causation.
Compare symptom patterns
Choose a report to compare candidate influences and safer next checks.
Fictional case
Choose a supported next step
Case feedback is an educational model. It records neither a completed road test nor a verified repair.
NVH & Intermittent Diagnostic Decisions
Six fictional shop scenarios; choose an appropriate and safe next step supported by available evidence.
08.6 · Knowledge Check
Ten questions assess concepts, not the ability to diagnose or repair an actual vehicle.
Continue learning
Return to Course Player · Complaint Intake · 08.1 · Scan Data · 08.3 · Complaint Investigation · 08.5
Use the fictional scenarios to plan which observations and approved tests would establish a cause. A completed online exercise is not hands-on competency.